Ask Employment Law

 

 

 

Remember:  There is no substitute for legal advice on the actual situation you find yourself in. The information posted on this site is for general information only, is based on UK law and should not be relied upon without specific legal advice, which is what I’d strongly recommend. If you can’t find the answer to your question or want to comment on this posting, email: info@reculversolicitors.co.uk or call 0207 324 6271

Back to Index

 

 

 

Question:

What rights does an employee have to access data held on them by the employer?               

 

 

Answer:

Data Protection is a massive area and this note only touches on the obligations of organisations holding personal data.  Please note that Public bodies will also be bound by the Freedom of Information Act.

 

In very simple terms, under the Data Protection Act, employees have the right to access paper files held by their employer on them, and electronic data held by the organisation on them.

 

‘Data subjects’ (in this case applicants and employees) have the right to obtain disclosure from the employer of:

 

·         The personal data held on them

·         The purpose for which the data is being processed and

·         Details of who the data is or may be disclosed to.

 

Employers can charge up to £10 to deal with a subject access request. Disclosure should be given ‘promptly’ and in any case within forty days of receiving the request. Employers only need provide disclosure of personal data held on a ‘relevant filing system’

 

What is a ‘relevant filing system’ for the purposes of complying with data access requests. (ie personnel file, other files,  emails, payroll records, other electronic records?).

This was covered in the leading case of Durant –v- FSA [2003] in the Court of Appeal.

 

MANUAL (PAPER) FILES:

·         Manual files are only covered by the act if the personal data is as readily accessible as on a computerised filing system.

·         So if you have to leaf through a file to see what information qualifies as personal data, that is not a relevant filing system.

·         In a relevant filing system the files are clearly structured and indicated at the outset of the search

 

ELECTRONIC FILES:

·         Pretty much any personal data held electronically will be covered by the data access request.

 

What does that mean in practice?

 

Let’s say Jane Bloggs makes a data access request under the Data Protection Act. What data does this apply to?

 

·         A paper Personnel file. Inevitably this will be covered by a data access request.

·         Personnel information held electronically will be covered. This includes payroll information as well as documents held on the C drive of personnel officers computers or a mainframe.

·         Documents held by other managers / personnel within the organisation. These will not be covered UNLESS (say) the line manager has a file entitled ‘Jane Smith’. Rather than ask everyone in the organisation whether they have any documents or files on Jane Smith, it would be sensible to ask Jane Smith herself who she wants you to check with. This should help focus the search. The good news is that if her line manager has notes from a meeting on which he has written ‘Jane is a nutter’, this does not have to be disclosed if it’s in loose papers on various subjects on his desk. However if it were placed on her personnel file, it would have to be.

·         Miscellaneous memos and letters held on other files not defined by reference to Jane Smith herself will not be covered.

·         Emails will be covered.

 

In her data access request, Jane Bloggs wants disclosure of any email ever sent between any member of staff including herself in which her name is mentioned.  Does the employer have to trawl through endless records to comply?

 

Emails will be covered. It’s impractical to carry out a search of all emails ever sent or received at whatever time, or to try to retrieve deleted emails. Again it’s worth clarifying with the employee herself the emails from and to whom she is concerned by and over which period. If the employer insists upon the employee  clarifying the search with respect to defined individuals, it is less likely that the Data Commissioner would criticise the employer if a complaint followed.

 

Lets say an ex employee makes a data access request, specifically asking for disclosure of the reference that the (ex) employer provided to his current employer. Is the (ex) employer obliged to disclose it?

 

·         The ex employer does not have to disclose confidential references provided by third parties

·         However the ex employer would have to disclose the reference that the organisation provided to his current employer.

 

If there are documents relating to a 3rd party who has left the organization (and possibly the country), is it necessary for the employer to obtain the express permission of that 3rd party before disclosing the information to the employee?

 

This is a really difficult area to deal with. When it comes to balancing the interests of the third party against those of the person making the data access request, in the Durant case the Court of Appeal said:

 

Ask yourself what legitimate interests the person making the request has in obtaining the disclosure of the identity of the third party. It may be appropriate to anonymise the data by blanking out the individuals name from a document.  You should not do so every time someone else’s name is mentioned though.

 

The Court of Appeal in Durant said:

 

·         ‘Is the information about the third party necessarily pat of the personal data that the data subject has requested?’

 

·         ‘If so, how critical is the third party information to the legitimate protection of the subject’s privacy, when balanced against the existence or otherwise of any obligation of confidence to the third party or any other sensitivity of the third party disclosure sought.’

 

Remember, it’s not necessary to obtain the express consent of a third party (whether or not a present employee), before releasing information about them.

 

However anything that discloses a third parties’

·         Private address

·         Private phone number

·         Private email address

·         Or information ‘sensitive’ data about their health, sexuality etc

 

…should not in my opinion be disclosed without their express consent.   See also our page on personal data.

 

Last reviewed: July 2010.

 

 

 

James Carmody

Employment Solicitor

 

Reculver Solicitors

12-16 Clerkenwell Road

London EC1M 5PQ

 

www.reculversolicitors.co.uk

info@reculversolicitors.co.uk

Tel 0207 324 6271

 

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority

 

© Reculver Solicitors. 2005-