Ask Employment Law

 

 

 

Remember:  There is no substitute for legal advice on the actual situation you find yourself in. The information posted on this site is for general information only, is based on UK law and should not be relied upon without specific legal advice, which is what I’d strongly recommend. If you can’t find the answer to your question or want to comment on this posting, email: info@reculversolicitors.co.uk or call 0207 324 6271

Back to Index

 

 

 

Question:

Can employees take time off to deal with family emergencies?               

 

 

Answer:

Employees do have the statutory right to take time off to deal with an emergency involving a dependent.

 

·         This is an unpaid right

·         Employees are entitled to a reasonable period of unpaid time off during working hours to deal with an emergency involving a dependent.

·         Normally, this would be a maximum of one or two days.

·         This right does not, for example, enable an employee to remain at home for the full duration of a child’s illness.

·         The purpose of the time off is to deal with the immediate problem and possibly make alternative arrangements.

 

The right is given to enable employees to deal with an unexpected or sudden problem and to make any necessary longer term arrangements normally:

·         To assist an ill or injured dependant. 

·         To arrange care for an ill or injured dependant

·         For unexpected disruption of care arrangements

·         To deal with an unexpected problem at school

·         On  the death of a dependant

 

·         The employee should inform the line manager of the reason for the absence as soon as is reasonably practicable and its expected length.

·         A dependant will normally mean a spouse, child, parent, co-habitee or any other person in the same household (but not a tenant, lodger or boarder).

 

In one reported case called Qua v John Ford Morrison, Solicitors [2003] NLJ 95, EAT an employee took 17 absences to look after his sick child & the employer dismissed her, saying that she was not providing the reliable work required of her. She had not been employed for a year, and claimed automatic unfair dismissal under s57A. The EAT reiterated that:

 

·         The purpose of the right is to enable the employee to arrange care, not necessarily to provide it (other than possibly on the first day, eg when the child contracts chickenpox). 

·         Once the initial notification has been done (with an estimate of likely period) there is no continuing duty to keep the employer updated.

·         In the vast majority of cases ‘reasonable time off’ will only mean hours, or a day or two at most.

 

Employees are not entitled to unlimited amounts of time off work even if in each case s/he complies with the notice requirements in section 57A(2) Employment Rights Act 1996 and takes a reasonable amount of time off on each occasion. Once it is known that the particular child is suffering from an underlying medical condition then arguably the employee cannot rely on the right each time the child falls ill as a result of that particular condition.

 

See our page on disciplinary procedures

 

Last reviewed:  July 2010

 

 

 

James Carmody

Employment Solicitor

 

Reculver Solicitors

12-16 Clerkenwell Road

London EC1M 5PQ

 

www.reculversolicitors.co.uk

info@reculversolicitors.co.uk

Tel 0207 324 6271

 

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority

 

© Reculver Solicitors. 2005-